New Beginnings

This might get a little existential.

I haven’t written anything for a while. I’m not sure I remember how to.

There was never a conscious decision to stop writing at The Peaklander, it just stopped being fun. Writing posts takes a lot of time and you get very little in return. In a culture where we want to consume our media as efficiently and mind-numbingly as possible (swipe, swipe, double-tap), people don’t visit blogs unless they’re looking for something specific.

Think of the last time you went on Instagram and without going back to check, how many photos did you scroll past? How many photos did you double-tap to like? How many of those photos did you actually like? I’m noticing more frequently that if you were to ask me those questions within 5 minutes of me closing Instagram, I couldn’t answer some of them. The way you interact with it is so habitual that it makes any meaningful engagement unlikely a lot of the time. It’s like QVC for millennials. Background noise where you occasionally buy something you didn’t need.

I didn’t start The Peaklander with the idea that it might become popular (and it didn’t), but there was still something disheartening about spending an hour writing a post only for someone to tap the heart icon on Twitter without actually clicking through to the link to read the post.

The mist rolls in after sunset at Dalby Forest.

So, for the last few months I’ve been away. I’m not sure I’m fully back yet, but I have a few ideas about how I might revive this thing I was once enthusiastic about. I didn’t start enjoying the outdoors for an audience and I certainly didn’t start walking the Peaks because it was cool – it wasn’t then and still isn’t, although companies like Ordnance Survey are trying their best to commercialise and market it to turn outdoors experiences into digital revenue.

What I loved about walking at the beginning and still love now is the experience. It’s the peace and quiet, the space to think, the connection with nature, the feeling that I have a place in the landscape and, consequently, in its history and future. These are the things I’m going to start writing about more. It might get a little existential once in a while, but that’s what I love about the outdoors – it gives you the space to pick away at the questions that matter.

Is this thing still on?

It’s been a while since I posted here and I’m a month away from having to decide what to do with the site. For those of you who don’t know, keeping a WordPress site active doesn’t come cheap and, unless you’re either incredibly tenacious or exceptionally lucky (I’m neither), a website doesn’t make you any money.

I’ve also found that while the outdoors is an underlying thread of most of the things I do, there’s a lot more I want to talk about. I’ve been battling with social media and mental health for the last year, while my meditation practice has developed immeasurably. I always imagined The Peaklander would be purely about the outdoors, but I’m wondering if there’s a place for that stuff here as well.

Does The Peaklander feel like an outdoors blog to you? Should it be kept that way so I can give the other topics focus elsewhere? Or would some additional rumination sit well amongst the outdoors stuff?

I’d love to know what you think. As far as I’m aware, barely anyone reads this and I’m entirely overthinking it. Of course, there’s always the alternative option: do nothing and sunset The Peaklander in February when the credit card is due to take its annual hit.

Chee Dale, Miller’s Dale and Wye Dale

The Peak District isn’t all about hills; a view doesn’t have to be in the distance for it to be breathtaking.

Chee Dale Walk.png

The Peak District, while unsurprisingly revered for its hills, also holds its own when it comes to deep gorges and stunning forests. This walks takes us through a unique and captivating area in the Peaks just east of Buxton.

Back in the 1860s, the engineering might of the Victorians faced the challenge of the steep cliffs and plunging gorges surrounding the River Wye in Derbyshire. The result, Midland Railway’s mainline between Manchester and London, incurred the wrath of Victorian critic and conservationist John Ruskin. What was once seen as industry encroaching upon the limestone heartland is now known as the Monsal Trail, a walkway along clifftops, through viaducts and imposing tunnels, and into deep gorges.

This walk starts at Miller’s Dale old station car park and follows the multi-use Monsal Trail through Chee Tor Tunnel.

Chee Tor Tunnel No 1.jpg
Chee Tor Tunnel

While the first two miles heading away from the car park will reveal old girder bridges, long tunnels and the odd view down into the canyon of the Wye, the two-mile return journey will see you walk into a fairytale landscape that somehow remains unknown to the masses.

IMG_1744.jpg
The first set of stepping stones in Chee Dale.

In the summer, Chee Dale is full of colour and fragrances. It really is some of the most remarkable landscape I know of. As you advance downstream, keeping tightly to the bank, you’ll cross stepping stones and the odd footbridge.

IMG_1763.jpg
The cliff faces almost arches over you at the second group of stepping stones.

It’s worth mentioning that if the first set of stepping stones is even remotely under water, don’t continue – the next section of your walk will be completely impassable. Don’t attempt it. The rest of your path home follows a section of extraordinary tranquility. Limestone cliffs rise above you, the Monsal Trail marking their edges like a travelator in the sky. You’ll cling to the water’s edge here, climbing over rocks, the odd fallen tree, and navigating around shallow pools and streams before climbing back up to the Monsal Trail and returning to Miller’s Dale car park where you started.

The Peak District isn’t all about hills; a view doesn’t have to be in the distance for it to be breathtaking.

You can follow the route I took on ViewRanger.

Scarpa R-Evolution GTX

Scarpa’s R-Evolution GTX boots don’t quite add up to the sum of their parts.

I haven’t written a gear review on The Peaklander before and there are a few reasons why:

  1. I’m not popular enough for brands to care about my opinion, so they don’t send free things my way to review.
  2. I don’t want to buy one of everything that Cotswold Outdoor stock just so I can review it, because the chances are I won’t need one of everything when I go to the Peaks for a walk.
  3. I tend to buy kit that’s been reviewed by people whose opinions I respect and whose opinions have far more weight than my own. You may as well read their reviews rather than reading mine.

And yet, here we are. I’m doing a gear review. Why? Well, nearly a year ago I went and bought myself some fancy boots for walking in and wanted to report back. I’ve also noticed that most of the people I follow in the outdoors world post their ‘unbiased and honest opinion’ about kit they’ve been sent to review by manufacturers. I’m not saying their reviews are biased or dishonest in any way, but I suspect you’re more likely to be favourable to a manufacturer when they’re sending you free stuff. Say nice things, along comes more free stuff. More reviews equals more followers, equals more free stuff, equals the heady heights of that pinnacle of modern society, Social Media Stardom.

Back when I started hillwalking, I did what I expect most sensible people do: I went to Mountain Warehouse and bought the bare minimum of the most basic kit I needed to complete a walk, just in case I did it once and decided it wasn’t for me. Turns out that I liked hillwalking and after a while I needed kit that would last longer and weather more storms, so I upgraded my kit to the more practical mid-range. This is where the Craghoppers of the world live; it’s not the most expensive kit on the shelf, but it’s where you get the most bang for your buck. Never have I been let down by Craghoppers. It’s excellent.

Occasionally, I’ve been sucked in by a bargain and you’ll sometimes see me in the more aspirational walking gear. I have a Mountain Equipment soft-shell. I have some Mammut bits ‘n’ bobs. You can tell these items are a little more refined than your more middlin’ gear, but I’ve rarely been glad to have spent the extra. When it comes to British weather, Craghoppers, Rab, and similar brands are all you need. You don’t need alpine kit to walk the British hills because – unless this has escaped your attention – we’re not in the Alps. By all means, go and buy all the logos and feel good about it, but you really don’t need to.

I’ll always remember heading to the trig point on Shutlingsloe in the winter a couple of years ago where my mate proudly pulled a Mountain Equipment down jacket out of his bag to combat the chill. He’d spent a fortune on the thing and it was back in the bag within minutes – turns out it gets a lot colder at the summit of actual mountains than it does on our green and pleasant hills. While you undoubtedly look cool in your big-logo-designed-for-real-mountains down jacket, you also get a bit sweaty if you put it on ‘to take the chill off’ on a not-quite-a-proper-mountain hill. Being sweaty on a hill in a blizzard while you’re not actually moving is an experience you don’t need.

My history of walking boots is fairly short. I’ve always bought three-season boots and relied on lighter approach shoes when the weather was too hot for boots. My first pair of walking boots cost £30 and came in that initial Mountain Warehouse haul. My second pair were Merrell’s. I loved those boots, they lasted for ages and they were as comfortable as boots can be. They were also around the £120 mark. Certainly not cheap, but also not the most lavish purchase. And that, dear readers, brings me onto my latest pair of walking boots – I splashed out on some Scarpa R-Evolution GTX a year ago.

I figured I’d been doing this long enough that I deserved some nice boots, especially with the Pennine Way planned for next year. The R-Evolutions looked perfect. They were lightweight, had a GTX liner, Vibram soles and Scarpa describe them as “a modern hybrid that combines a rugged backpacking boot with a nimble trail shoe”. Just what I was after. They even called them ‘R-Evolution’. You don’t put ‘revolution’ and ‘evolution’ in your boot name unless you’ve made something special.

Scarpa were founded back in 1938 and are still owned and operated by the same people in the same region of Italy where it started. There’s a lot to be said for that – only brands who know what they’re doing and do it with integrity stand the test of time in the outdoors clothing market. Us outdoorsy folk don’t tend to be inclined to seasonal fashions and I suspect it wouldn’t be an entrepreneurs first choice demographic to turn a quick buck. Scarpa are great; they’re trusted, respected and they make excellent kit.

IMG_1772.jpg

One of the headline features of this boot (and rightly so) is Sock-Fit construction, which is basically a single piece of elastic fabric that wraps around your foot, making its sensitivity similar to that of a rock shoe. The Scholler S-tech fabric links the ankle flex zone and collar with an elastic movement which feels like you’re wearing the world’s most rugged pair of socks.

That rugged feeling continues into the rest of the boot, having both a Vibram Fagus Lite sole for optimum shock absorption and a toe rand that will protect your feet when you’ve reached the point of the walk where you’re kicking rocks about because lifting your leg to step over them is just too hard. You also get a Gore-Tex lining in the R-Evolutions, so you can be sure that your feet will stay dry even if the British weather doesn’t.

Sounds great, doesn’t it? And yet the Scarpa R-Evolution doesn’t quite add up to the sum of its parts. When you slip these boots on and do them up, I challenge you to find a more comfortable pair of boots. They’re lovely. The toe box is pretty bloody cramped, but once you stop thinking about whether you should’ve gone a half size bigger than every other Scarpa boot you’ve ever bought, the snugness and fit is perfect.

The Gore-Tex is as dependable as ever – I’ve crossed chilly streams in these plenty of times and have felt neither cold nor damp – and they’re lightweight enough that you don’t feel the extra fatigue of lugging around a heavy pair of boots.

IMG_1774.jpg

There’s only one reason I can’t recommend these boots and it’s a big one: the traction is appalling. Let me qualify that because it’s a broad statement. If you’re hiking in dry conditions on rocks, these boots will be great. If you’re hiking in fields in summer, these boots will be great. If your walk has two or more of these things in any combination, you’re going to be miserable in these boots:

  • Mud
  • Rocks
  • Water

Mud? Fine. Rocks? Fine. Water? Fine.

Mud near rocks? You’ll fall over. Water near rocks? You’ll fall over. Rocks near water? You’ll fall in. Water near mud? You’ll fall over.

In 8 years of walking in the Peaks, I’d never slipped. Not in rain, mud, water, snow or ice. I never once lost the ‘first person to fall in the ice buys the beer’ game. Then I bought these R-Evolutions and I’d slipped once near a waterfall and nearly went in. It put this down to me not paying attention. Then I slipped on rocks near a stream. Again, I put this down to me being careless. Then I slipped on dry rocks after walking through a field, then on damp rocks after some drizzle, then on stones in a muddy path. I started to feel like I wasn’t safe wearing the Scarpa R-Evolution GTX, like I was actively putting myself in danger, so I got in touch with Scarpa via their website to ask if something was awry.

Scarpa service didn’t let me down. They agreed that this didn’t sound like it should be happening, but they acknowledged that they’d heard of the problem on some of their cheaper boots that don’t use Vibram rubber – the compound of the sole is too dense and that leads to similar things to what I’d been experiencing. They sent me a packing label and asked me to ship my boots to them by courier for testing by the Aftersales Manager. A week later, I got in touch with them to find out what they’d discovered and… nothing. The rubber was fine, the boots were as intended and they’d be finding their way back to me in a few days.

Having spent the last few weeks while my Scarpas were being tested wearing my older boots and trail shoes, I’d started to remember why I enjoyed walking – I could spend the time immersing myself in the environment and looking around at views without worrying about whether a touch of semi-evaporated morning dew on a rock might send me plummeting to my death. With trepidation, I wore my newly returned Scarpa R-Evolutions on a walk this weekend. It was muddy, it was damp, and it was near water.

I slipped. I was miserable.

I’m not sure what it is about these boots. The lugs don’t clear out well at all, which would explain why everything becomes slippy after you’ve been near some mud, but it doesn’t explain why a wet rock would become akin to an ice rink in otherwise un-clogged boots.

I loved these boots when I tried them on in the store and broke them in around the local area, but that love affair ended once I got them out into the wild. I can’t recommend them. I definitely wouldn’t wear them if I was doing a walk solo… Mountain Rescue have it hard enough as it is.

Adventure & Tech

This idea that technology is bad, that GPS is cheating, that outdoors aides make you less of an outdoorsy type – these ideas need to die. They’re steeped in the past, they’re unhelpful and they don’t encourage anybody to discover our beautiful outdoor spaces.

Ordnance Survey have a wonderful initiative called #GetOutside. There aren’t many hashtags I rally around on social media and I’m pretty picky about the causes I support, but #GetOutside is one that I love. I can’t sum it up any better than Ordnance Survey’s own Nick Giles:

“The GetOutside initiative is core to OS’s aims to help more people to GetOutside more often, it is about inspiring adventures, enabling experiences and helping make memories. It’s already encouraging people to re-engage with the outdoors and showing that it is enjoyable, accessible and safe for all ages and abilities.

 

We all know the statistics. The shocking levels of obesity and inactivity within Great Britain, even amongst children. A sedentary lifestyle is easy, and it’s winning, and we’re seeing the effects of that on people’s mental and physical health. We appreciate people have busy lives and responsibilities, and that finding the time is not always easy, but we can all incorporate getting outside into our daily routines.”

I read a post last night shared (and presumably endorsed, but I’m making an assumption that may be incorrect) by one of the #GetOutside Champions. That article kept me up last night. It royally pissed me off.

I’m not going to name who wrote the article other than to say it wasn’t the person who shared it, nor am I going to link to it. All too often on social media a difference of opinion becomes personal despite each person having good intentions and seeing merit in each other’s ideas, so I’m going to talk about why I disagree with the theme. Mine will become another blog post floating in the ether that likely garners less than 1% of the views of the article I disagree with. If I had any social savvy or cared about clicks and likes, I’d probably link to it, create a discussion and, in the midst of my burgeoning popularity, people would forget that it’s ideas that should be challenged and not the people who hold them.

That shared blog post loftily stated that if you don’t use paper maps and instead use technology, you’re not a real outdoorsy-type. It went on to say that GPS devices are for ‘children and amateurs’.

giphy.gif

We need to lose this rhetoric otherwise a new generation of ‘children and amateurs’ won’t be encouraged to find out what our National Parks are like because they’ll be too worried about running into some holier-than-thou rambler with a ‘pocketable’ laminated map the size of a tablecloth in their hands, and a rehearsed lecture ready to go whenever the audience arises. Please don’t turn outdoor communities into an echo chamber where only real outdoors types post photos of themselves in places inferior city-dwelling types mustn’t tread; where the enlightened few can raise a pint of filtered bog water to each other before they bed down in an outcrop of heather having woven a mosquito net out of nothing but wild grass and wishes.

Don’t wear your outdoors skills like a badge of honour that puts you on a pedestal. Unless, of course, you’re doing DofE or in the Scouts or something; they’re pretty big on badges. Use your skills to inspire the intrepid and curious people who want to learn more. Don’t tell them they’re doing it wrong when they’ve only just started.

I wrote a post challenging the idea that paper maps are essential in all circumstances – it was surprisingly popular and got a lot of support, but I’m reluctant to repeat myself. I want, instead, to look at the other side of things. This idea that technology is bad, that GPS is cheating, that outdoors aides make you less of an outdoorsy type – these ideas need to die. They’re steeped in the past, they’re unhelpful and they don’t encourage anybody to discover our beautiful outdoor spaces. You know who’s going to be wandering our National Parks in 50-100 years? It won’t be you and me, it’ll be the younger generations we encourage to love the parks and their children. Stop demeaning them and making them feel like they’re not doing it right. In my view, we need to show them why there’s so much to love in the outdoors and the skills and knowledge will come later once the enthusiasm and thirst for more takes its hold. Let’s not put unnecessary barriers in their way.

My friend, Rob, is a driving instructor. He’s one of the best driving instructors in the county and is exceptionally talented at providing courses for people with learning difficulties or special needs. I know a similar argument has been happening for decades with (especially older) drivers bemoaning the use of in-car tech such as sat navs. I wanted to get Rob’s opinion on this because there’s an undeniable parallel between navigational tech in the car and orienteering tech in the outdoors – we’re just a long way behind. His response was so perfect, I’m going to post it in full:

Tech can help to reduce cognitive overload allowing a better focus on the true task in hand. In the context of driving, true driving is about what happens outside the window (judgement, assessment, interaction…) not the physical aspect of body movements – reducing the physical load allows greater brain processing on the true skills of driving. We shouldn’t be clinging onto 19th century tech for the sake of nostalgia when we have a better way. Even pen and paper is a tech which allows us to reduce cognitive overload, storing information outside the brain – at the time of its invention this was frowned upon. Even weather forecasting was frowned upon initially, anything new is seen as cheating or heresy.

I asked him to weigh in on how this might translate into the paper maps/GPS debate:

[The idea that analogue is better than digital] is very narrow-minded and works on the basis that we all perceive information the same way. We are a diverse species and our brains all work very differently, some can process paper maps well and that’s fantastic for them. Others will struggle, so a different form of processing should be sought and this is where technology can be wonderful as it provides alternative means to make sense of the same information. A map/satnav or any tech is simply an interface between ‘reality’ and the brain – we should each find what works for us best. I imagine that a lot of individuals with dyslexia/dyspraxia/Irlens Syndrome would struggle with map reading due to the perception issues – it would be insulting and crude to imply that they are lesser because of this. Technology can provide different means to access the same information allowing for the sheer diversity of brain types existent in the human race. Use whatever is necessary to make sense and enjoyment from the world around you. Technology is fantastic for this and it’s insulting that those who benefit are mocked by those who use a different style despite the fact they are using their own crutch (a map).

I may as well stop writing here. Rob said everything I wanted to say and managed to say it in a more eloquent way than I could.

When I wrote Is there still a place in your backpack for paper maps?, the answer was a resounding ‘yes’! I pretty much always have a paper map and compass in my bag for backup. I don’t think the arguments for using paper maps exclusively over technology such as phones and GPS stand up to scrutiny anymore, but I think map-reading and orienteering skills are incredibly helpful skills to have. Useful, yes. Pre-requisites, no.

If you’re the kind of person that blindly follows your sat nav along roads that you’re not supposed to be on and have routinely had to swerve to miss things like lakes after following a line on a screen, you should probably stay inside. A paper map isn’t going to solve your problems and Mountain Rescue have it hard enough as it is.

If, like me, you’re in love with that intersection between technology and the outdoors, I have good news. The Ordnance Survey app is very good and they’ve recently released a series of OS GPS devices which I hear are also very good reasonable. I haven’t tried one of those, but if I ever do I’ll report back. It really does encourage me to see that Ordnance Survey’s #GetOutside initiative and their Champions are having such a positive effect and that the company is striving to instil passion for the outdoors in the next generation. I just wish all ramblers were as forward-thinking.

You can follow Ordnance Survey on Twitter here, on Instagram here, and find out more about their #GetOutside initiative here. If you want to follow a few of my favourite #GetOutside Champions, who all make the outdoors both accessible and enjoyable, you can’t do much better than these three:

Kate Jamieson: Blog | Twitter | Instagram

Zoe Homes: Blog | Twitter | Instagram

Potty Adventures: Blog | Twitter | InstagramYouTube

Mark

Adventure & Worry

Or: How to do a long walk, which is quite a scary thing to do when you (over)think about it.

Or: How to do a really long walk, which is quite a scary thing to do when you (over)think about it

Anxiety is a fairly loaded word these days and I’m reluctant to use it here. If you’ve ever suffered with it, you’ll know that it’s pervasive; it’s the fear our ancestors would have had when they knew a predator could sneak up on them at any moment, but somehow your mind has convinced you that you need to feel the same way at 10am on a Tuesday morning when you’re just trying to get a spreadsheet done. This isn’t a post about anxiety, but it is a post about worry. Maybe you’ll know what I’m talking about.

Continue reading “Adventure & Worry”

Is there still a place in your backpack for paper maps?

Do you still need paper maps to be safe outdoors? And which electronic mapping is the best? This is my review of Ordnance Survey and ViewRanger.

I write this post with some degree of reticence. You see, there’s an unspoken code amongst walkers that you always take a map and compass even if you know where you’re going and you’ve done it a million times. In fact, it’s something even I recommend in my Beginner’s Guide to Hill Walking. I think it’s a good idea. It’s a sensible idea. It’s something I do… some of the time.

If I’m hiking in the Peak District, I have weatherproof OS Explorer Maps for the Dark and White Peak and I take my OS compass with me on every walk. It’s nothing fancy and it doesn’t add a ton of weight for day walks, but if the whole escapade went to hell, I could use them to find my way to somewhere useful.

Having said that, I was in the Brecon Beacons last week to walk Pen y Fan and the Waterfalls Walk and I didn’t take paper maps. Why? Because I didn’t own them and the Brecon Beacons is split across three maps, which starts to add a considerable cost and bulk to packing. Also, I have subscriptions to OS Maps through both the Ordnance Survey website and through ViewRanger. I’m not a massive fan of spending money when I’ve already paid for a thing in a different format.

I’m planning to walk the Pennine Way at some point this year or next and, honestly, I probably won’t be buying all of the maps for that either. Six weatherproof maps take up a lot of space and come in at over £100. Now, I could plan to have maps delivered to me at drop points along the route or I’m sure I could buy them as I go, but it’s impossible to avoid the fact that the bulk still adds up as quickly as the cost does.

 

OS-Explorer-maps-in-map-store.jpg
The OS Explorer maps that we all know and love

 

The argument goes that paper maps and a compass will never fail you. This is entirely true, with one major caveat: that you know how to use them and visibility is good enough that you can actually see a couple of landmarks. However, while there’s always a Peak District map set in my backpack for weekend walks, I haven’t needed them in five or more years. Electronic mapping is my preferred choice to find my location and bearing, but ask anyone wearing tweed or decked out in Berghaus for the weekend and they’ll tell you that relying on electronic maps is a recipe for disaster. I have to say, I disagree.

If you don’t know how to use a paper map and compass, you’ll get lost if that’s all you have at your disposal. Similarly, if you don’t make sure you’re prepared to use electronic maps, you’re also going to come unstuck.

The main argument against using electronic mapping is that of battery life. If your battery dies, you’re screwed. Again, this is true, but battery packs that can recharge a device multiple times while it’s still in use are a dime a dozen. I have a couple of RavPower portable chargers – one that will charge an iPhone 8 Plus two or three times (it’s tiny) and a large one that will keep multiple iPhones and an Apple Watch charged for about a week. It’s a little heavy, but it’ll easily fit in your backpack while taking up less space than a single paper map.

Based on recent experience, however, I’ve found my perfect setup: it’s a combination of OS Maps on the web and ViewRanger on the Apple Watch. The latter does a very clever thing where it hands off a lot of the battery-sucking duties to the iPhone, which means that neither your Apple Watch or iPhone take a massive hit. What’s more, the Apple Watch is always accessible and exactly where you need it, and it’s waterproof. This means your iPhone can be safely stowed in a drysack and you never need to touch it. I’ve been trying to work out how far I think I could hike in a single journey using this setup and, based on massively unscientific observation, I reckon I could easily cover 20 miles on foot. On my last 10 mile route, my Apple Watch battery went from 100% down to 65% and my iPhone went from 100% down to 82%. I think 20 miles would be reasonable. Beyond that, you’re chancing it without the means to recharge.

“But what if your phone and Apple Watch break?” I hear you cry. Well, if that happens, we’re already having a Type III fun kind of day, aren’t we? My response to this is that if one of those devices fails, I have the other as backup. If both of them fail, the other three hikers I tend to go walking with will have their own phones with the route pre-loaded. If the five devices we have between us all fail… well, yeah, then we’re well and truly screwed. To people who think electronic mapping is the devil, my counter-challenge is this: what if your paper map blows away?

Of course, the other benefit of electronic mapping over good ol’ orienteering is that if visibility is appalling, you’ll still know exactly where you are and which way to point yourself. Finding your location on a paper map depends largely on a line of sight and reference to at least a couple of landmarks… if you’re on Kinder with its famous fog and visibility down to a few feet (as it can often be and, let’s face it, it’s pretty barren on a sunny day), electronic mapping is your surest and easiest bet. Even the satellites can see you through fog.

With all that said, I wanted to use this post to give a quick appraisal of the two apps I use: OS Maps and ViewRanger. They both excel and fall short in different ways, but happily, these failures and strengths complement each perfectly.

OS Maps

Let’s get this out of the way first of all, because there’s no debate to be had: Ordnance Survey maps are the standard and there’s nothing out there that comes close to beating them for clarity and information. All of my route planning starts on the OS Maps website without fail.

 

OS Maps Explorer.jpg
OS Landranger 1: 25 000 scale mapping – Ordnance Survey’s most detailed leisure map

 

Using either the OS Leisure Maps or National Parkways maps, plotting a route on the OS Maps website is so simple and pleasingly accurate that it almost raises a smile on my wind-beaten face. The website plots the route between two waypoints, following every twist and turn in intricate detail. For anyone with OCD about the route matching the actual path (ahem, that’ll be me), it’s an absolute godsend. Honestly, it’s really satisfying. Even if you’re not going anywhere, just give it a go and feel good about your day.

Once you get to the end of the route and hit Save, that route becomes immediately available in the Ordnance Survey OS Maps apps for iOS and Android, where you can also download an offline map to ensure you have access when you’re in the remote hills without a signal. OS Maps also has an incredible number of pre-plotted routes from AA Walks, Trail Magazine and myriad other publishers, along with community-created routes – all included in your subscription for no extra cost.

 

OS Maps plotting
Ordnance Survey overview of snap to route

 

Unfortunately, the place where we hand over to the mobile app is the place where OS Maps and I take leave of each other. As beautifully-designed and easy to use as the OS Maps app is, it leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to actually following your route.

 

osmaps-iphone6.jpg
OS Maps on the iPhone

 

This isn’t just a one-off, this is how it always goes for me: load up the OS Maps app in the hills, find the route you previously plotted and hit Follow Route. Simple. Now you start walking. Maybe my expectations are too high, but what I expect to happen next is that the little arrow (which tells me my location) keeps up with me. As I move, it moves. Except, this doesn’t happen. You can walk for one minute, two minutes or five minutes, and that little arrow belligerently stays where it is. Give the screen a poke, move the map a little and the arrow will snap to where you actually are. It’s almost as if it nods off when you’re not looking and then jolts itself awake, pretending that it was with you all along.

p7I5eZfX1GFnG.gif

This isn’t device-specific either, I’ve experienced exactly the same behaviour on multiple iPhones. Perhaps Android fares better?

The other issue with using the OS Maps app for navigation is the lack of an Apple Watch app. This means I constantly have to have my phone to hand. In an urban environment that would be entirely reasonable, but not in the hills. You see, you can’t keep it in your pocket because it might meet its demise when it falls out as you’re scrambling. You can’t keep it in your larger thigh pocket because you might bash it on a rock. You can’t keep it in your backpack because it’s an almighty pain in the arse to have to take it off every time you want to check you’re on the route. If it’s raining, that means taking off the backpack cover, opening the backpack, soaking half your stuff which you’d previously secured in a drysack, and then exposing your very expensive iDevice to the elements. I know that you can get those bags to put your phone in that allow it to hang from your neck and survive the rain, but… no. Not when there are better solutions out there.

 

59560-hydroseal-case-phone-case-plus-1
Lifeventure Hydroseal mobile phone pouch

 

And so, I use the OS Maps website to plot my route, but then I export it as a GPX file and head over to ViewRanger.

ViewRanger

ViewRanger suffers from the exact opposite problems to OS Maps – the website is the clunky part, but the route tracking on mobile is unparalleled. Now, you can plot a route in ViewRanger on the website. You can even purchase a separate OS Maps subscription through their app and plot your routes using OS Maps inside ViewRanger. While this sounds like the ultimate solution, ViewRanger’s snap-to-route function is nowehere near as detailed or intricate as it is on OS Maps, and the route line that’s generated isn’t as satisfyingly smooth. It’s more like an approximation of the route; you don’t get every twist and turn, but you get a line that more-or-less overlays the National Parkways paths. This might be fine for some, but I’m not a fan. I like my routes to show me exactly where I’m going, even if it’s blatantly obvious. To solve that, I just use ViewRanger’s helpful Create Route from GPX feature and import the route I previously made in OS Maps. It creates about a billion waypoints, but I’m fine with that as you only see the ones you add detail to when you’re using it in the field.

 

8301-470
If you have a device, ViewRanger is probably available for it

 

In the same way that OS Maps provides routes from publishers like AA Walks, so too does ViewRanger. The difference is that, while the publisher routes are included in your OS Maps subscription, they often cost some money in ViewRanger. So get them from OS Maps if you have that as well.

Now, over to the ViewRanger app. I’ll start by saying this: it’s not intuitive. There are buttons everywhere, they all do things you don’t expect, some of them are in places they shouldn’t be, and syncing isn’t automatic. Once you’ve found the sync button (which only uploads and downloads data, it doesn’t sync destructive edits like deletes performed in the app), your route is available. You can now download an offline version of the map (I always grab Ordnance Survey 1:25,000 maps), sync the route across to your Apple Watch and head to the hills.

 

8344-480.jpg
ViewRanger on the Apple Watch. My perfect walking companion.

 

Once you’re at the start of your walk, you just hit Start on the Apple Watch and ViewRanger takes care of all the clever stuff in the background. You don’t need to think about it anymore. It’s frugal with the battery, it shows you a map you can zoom in and out of, tells you how much further you have to go, and – as if that weren’t enough – the little arrow updates to your precise location every time you look at it. It even shows you where you’ve been as well as where you’re going, which is incredibly helpful.

ViewRanger is second-to-none for following routes. It really is excellent. As you approach a waypoint you get notified of your next instruction and if you veer off the route by more than a reasonable amount, it’ll notify you to tell you to sort yourself out. I genuinely can’t fault the experience here.

Although it doesn’t directly relate to the experience of using ViewRanger in the wild, whenever I’ve had to contact them for technical support or subscription queries, the staff have always been exceptional. The speed, quality and clarity of interactions with them says a lot about the company they’re building.

Conclusion

Neither OS Maps or ViewRanger is perfect, but their strengths complement each other well. OS Maps is great on the web, but I wouldn’t depend on the mobile experience to get me where I’m going, which is kind of the point. ViewRanger, on the other hand, is incredible once you’re in the hills and ready to start following your route, but everything up to that point is a bit of a chore.

Between them, however, I have the perfect setup. Sure, I have to pay for OS subscriptions on both, but that gets me full UK mapping for £40 a year and the best experience wherever I am. The people who are wedded to their paper maps strike me as being the kind of people who still think using in-car sat navs is cheating. You know the kind – they pull out their AA route planner every few miles so that they can have an argument. For me, anything that makes walking easier, safer and removes distractions so you can enjoy the great outdoors around you is good in my book.

A couple of things to note about this article:

  1. All of the images in this post come from either the Ordnance Survey or ViewRanger websites. I didn’t ask their permission to use them, so if someone gets a bit shouty and this post looks incredibly boring all of a sudden, it was my fault.
  2. I wasn’t paid to write this review, nor was I asked to. This should go without saying; I’m nowhere near popular enough.